The recent crackdown on illegal places of worship raises important questions about the intersection of religious freedom and public safety. The proliferation of religious institutions, particularly those employing unconventional worship practices or operating from hazardous locations, has become a pressing concern.

While the right to religious freedom is a fundamental human right, it is not absolute. The state has a duty to protect its citizens, including their physical safety. The prevalence of churches conducting services in caves, among other precarious environments, poses significant risks to worshippers.

Such practices can expose individuals to dangers such as structural collapse, natural disasters, or even accidents.

ALSO READ Cultism in Rwanda: Dangerous worship practices spark debate on faith, safety

Moreover, some churches have adopted unorthodox worship methods that can be harmful or even exploitative. Instances of starvation, financial exploitation, and psychological manipulation have been perversive.

These practices not only violate individual rights but also undermine the integrity of religious institutions.

ALSO READ: Kagame tasks new MPs to end disorder in churches

It is imperative that the state maintain a vigilant watch over religious activities to ensure that they are conducted in a safe and responsible manner. This does not mean suppressing religious freedom but rather ensuring that it is exercised within reasonable limits. The government must strike a delicate balance between protecting individual rights and safeguarding public safety.

By strengthening oversight mechanisms and enforcing regulations, the state can help prevent harmful practices and protect vulnerable individuals. This may involve conducting regular inspections of church premises, investigating complaints, and working with religious leaders to promote responsible behavior.

In conclusion, the recent crackdown on churches in Rwanda highlights the need for a more nuanced approach to religious freedom. While the right to worship is essential, it cannot be used as a justification for endangering people's lives or exploiting vulnerable individuals.

By striking a balance between protecting individual rights and safeguarding public safety, the state can ensure that religious freedom is exercised responsibly and that all citizens are protected from harm.

It also call for introspection from the inter-religious council or the civil society in general for them to keep their members in check and not necessarily wait for government intervention to ensure some of these errant members are nipped in the bud.